|
Threads
View context
you seem to always want to bash others and say negative things. I have every right to quiver over the word because then they believe that's what its like in real life or actually Ageplayers have to hide because of others stupidity and misinformation. plain and simple Sexual Ageplay is a made of word and is not actually what Ageplay is. If an adult is having sex with a child that either incest or peto, plain and simple.
like(2)
just to "nit-pick" incest doesnt have to be with a child - just saying :P
However I do agree with your points. If I wear a child avatar and have sex that's not "ageplay" in the true meaning (I do get that some would say I am "playing a child - so its ageplay"). However, if I want feel free from my responsibilties and "act" childish - wear childish clothes - play with blocks etc but wearing my adult avatar..... then THAT is ageplay. "Acting" as a child - while not "wearing a child avatar" is ageplay. It being in a sexual context or not is not relevant to it.
One point that does irritate me though is that so many people will say someone is a "child avatar" if they are not a 7ft tall amazon with tanga breasts! I always (in SL and OS) wear a petite avatar. I believe my avatar looks like a young adult - but I've had my share of being banned from places because I am not over 6ft tall etc. I only mention this here because some people consider some adult avatars as child avatars which does muddy the waters somewhat.
liked(4)
However I do agree with your points. If I wear a child avatar and have sex that's not "ageplay" in the true meaning (I do get that some would say I am "playing a child - so its ageplay"). However, if I want feel free from my responsibilties and "act" childish - wear childish clothes - play with blocks etc but wearing my adult avatar..... then THAT is ageplay. "Acting" as a child - while not "wearing a child avatar" is ageplay. It being in a sexual context or not is not relevant to it.
One point that does irritate me though is that so many people will say someone is a "child avatar" if they are not a 7ft tall amazon with tanga breasts! I always (in SL and OS) wear a petite avatar. I believe my avatar looks like a young adult - but I've had my share of being banned from places because I am not over 6ft tall etc. I only mention this here because some people consider some adult avatars as child avatars which does muddy the waters somewhat.
I agree with what you said, i know incest is not just with a child but it can be part of it. with the young adult petite avatar bodies they have come out with now do make it hard because they look so young. I always try and as first but even there it seems we offend everyone just by asking.
liked(1)
I never get offended by someone asking if my avatar is over 18. The only time I get offended (and angry tbh) is when someone insists that she is not 18. I swear people must have never met many 18 year olds!!
liked(1)
Always? Let's quibble about that word. :) But yes, you have the right to quibble. Have at it.
liked(2)
View context
I agree with your statement, people will also become paranoid to what misinformation they have been told or see. In the end it affects people who do things without harm because of the harmful people running around telling misinformation.
like(2)
View context
I wouldn't consider myself misinformed at all, basically virtual worlds created this word based on child avatars telling them false info. Sexual Ageplay is never used in real life or in the community.
Ageplay is some one acting a younger age, not where they look like an actual child avatar. Even if you see a child avatar, most times there acting like an adult so how can you consider that Ageplay. My point was that looking like a child Avatar in world doesn't make it Ageplay.
there is a lot of things you said that i do agree on though. in a lot of countries sex between a child and an adult in world would be considered pedo or abuse. In virtual worlds depending on how its portrayed it can be both obscene and repugnant i can agree on that. I did read that article and a few others i came across. The term seems merely an online term made up without any connections to the actual community. However the way its portrayed that is what people think Ageplay is in real life and its not.
As far as your last statement about using it as guiding therapy my point would stand on this too. being in the category of regression its still the same. one acts like a younger age, they do not look like a full real life child.
like(1)
Ageplay is some one acting a younger age, not where they look like an actual child avatar. Even if you see a child avatar, most times there acting like an adult so how can you consider that Ageplay. My point was that looking like a child Avatar in world doesn't make it Ageplay.
there is a lot of things you said that i do agree on though. in a lot of countries sex between a child and an adult in world would be considered pedo or abuse. In virtual worlds depending on how its portrayed it can be both obscene and repugnant i can agree on that. I did read that article and a few others i came across. The term seems merely an online term made up without any connections to the actual community. However the way its portrayed that is what people think Ageplay is in real life and its not.
As far as your last statement about using it as guiding therapy my point would stand on this too. being in the category of regression its still the same. one acts like a younger age, they do not look like a full real life child.
I believe in the "real world" some "littles" (adults who may dress/act childish) may engage in "adult activities" but many others do not as they feel it doesnt feel right when they are in "littlespace". I think this just has to be right for the little and his/her caregiver and its noone elses business really. I've not really heard those who engage in this livestyle in RL call it "sexual ageplay" though. It's just "ageplay" (and whatever is done while engaging in that play).
Again though - I stress I am talking about adults engaging in RL roleplay such as Dom/little or Domme/little dynamics.
liked(1)
Again though - I stress I am talking about adults engaging in RL roleplay such as Dom/little or Domme/little dynamics.
in real life we do not call it sexual Ageplay, never have and never will. its just a made up term, we dont ever want to have sex with kids eithers. again any of that stuff seen online is pedo or incest play.
like(0)
Virtual worlds may well have coined the term, but it is virtual worlds that are our point of reference here, and as you will be aware, some terminology has a different meaning depending on the context in which it is used. Therefore ageplay within virtual worlds involves child avatars, and sexual ageplay child avatars or child and adult avatars in sexual simulations. That ageplay might have a different meaning in a different context is neither here nor there - it is what it means within the metaverse that is under discussion here.
The very fact that the several academic papers I looked at all used the term 'sexual ageplay' with a similar and specific meaning, all related to the context of virtual worlds can only mean that the term ageplay, no matter how it is used in other contexts, involves a child avatar.
For the removal of any doubt, any depiction of sexual behaviour between and adult avatar and a child avatar, or simulated sexual behaviour between two avatars that appear to be under 18 years old would be deemed child pornography, even if they were in a virtual world environment. It's not a matter of individual determination, but of the law in the UK and many other countries, and depictions of sexual ageplay is criminalised, even if it is a couple of cartoon avatars.
That ageplay might have a very different meaning outside of virtual worlds does not alter the meaning it has acquired within virtual worlds.
like(0)
The very fact that the several academic papers I looked at all used the term 'sexual ageplay' with a similar and specific meaning, all related to the context of virtual worlds can only mean that the term ageplay, no matter how it is used in other contexts, involves a child avatar.
For the removal of any doubt, any depiction of sexual behaviour between and adult avatar and a child avatar, or simulated sexual behaviour between two avatars that appear to be under 18 years old would be deemed child pornography, even if they were in a virtual world environment. It's not a matter of individual determination, but of the law in the UK and many other countries, and depictions of sexual ageplay is criminalised, even if it is a couple of cartoon avatars.
That ageplay might have a very different meaning outside of virtual worlds does not alter the meaning it has acquired within virtual worlds.
If its a couple of cartoon avatars - one (or more) with a child avatar - then yes. However, If its a couple of adult avatars - but one is wearing (for example) a pacifier and diaper (but still an adult avatar) then that is not "criminalised". There is no depiction of a child involved - just two adult avatars engaging in "whatever". I think THIS is (one example) of ageplay that Missresssdiagato is referring to (as opposed to actual child avatars).
If course the other half of this question is...... two adult avatars..... but how old are their "typists"?
like(0)
If course the other half of this question is...... two adult avatars..... but how old are their "typists"?
View context
I understand your point, but my point is Ageplay is where you still look adult while portraying another age. Ageplay does not mean look like an actual real life child. people want to be a child avatar that's fine but that is not considered Ageplay.
like(4)
View context
Of course it's two consenting adults, but portraying yourself as an actual child avatar in world doesn't make you an ageplayer. It's misrepresentation.
like(4)
View context
the valid point in this for me is I go to a region that claims there are 20 people via opensim website listing, im thinking there is a party. I walk in and no one answers and perhaps all bots. i dont care abotu ranks but i care about the fake number of real life people.
like(5)
Agreed, you look at OSW to see where people are gathering and then find it is fake. Also people and grids that don't fake their numbers and try to play by the rules get penalised and pushed right to the bottom of the rankings because some scummy selfish people want to rig the system and break the rules.
liked(2)
View context
ive not noticed items with only animations and no scripts. which items are they? and your so welcome
like(0)
I remember it was at least 2 couches in the bottom area. ALSO I saw a set in the beach furniture that is ACD its a little blanket with a cute light string - it was not marked for sale and could not take a copy. Just fyi .
like(0)
View context
Guess what, I have a pack in the little shop there with a kit to build a surf scene. And I am giving surfboard rezzers to those who want one. Since the boards get updated so often I am creating the rezzers one at a time though. You want one:? =) I am happy to give one to you - but they work in Bullet enabled regions .
liked(2)
View context
Lone maked it. Well the thing is you need a chat gpi account and an API key (you have to pay for it ) and then you need a web server with something that can do the connection between the bot in world and the CHAT GPT API. I am working on a version that uses a free API
liked(3)
View context
just wait until u see it for yourself and the main park also has a few new upgrades as well as bumper boats now.
like(1)
View context
when we were on v5.99983 we ran into a duplication issue, fred thought a permission would fix it and he upgraded to 5.499984 but nope we still having. so fred still working on it i guess.
like(0)