OpenSimWorld is the directory of 3D Virtual Worlds based on OpenSimulator and connected through the HyperGrid. Learn More
New Members
RayneBlaze, SelenaaFletcher, LalaFunkel, Edyth_Aviatik, Morgane Volaren, DanteYe, Mario1983, Mirabella, RobertHims, Aduda, DJ_DaDy, Chriss, Monica40, Marlis, Yingyong, Essence-Media, Kikkobis65, DebbieThom, AmberVicious, JuvenileBrigadeLikes
Liked by: 
Comments
Diamond may not see this because she has blocked me. I apologize for the public discourse, but I will always defend Kal and anyone else who has been hurt and bullied. I don't know if Kal is blocked, as she has finally been able to get some rest. She didn't deserve for this to happen. Perhaps Diamond will one day learn to be more understanding and compassionate and think before she slanders anyone else. Peace and Love, and I hope this is the last of it. I know...I am too principled, and when it comes to my sister, I would move mountains for her. I am not good at keeping my mouth shut when someone I care about or love has been harmed. That is probably one of my biggest flaws. Or is it a strength? Peace.
like(0)
Thanks, Spec, for the suggestion. This is what ChatGPT had to say about it.
1. The Core Conflict
Trigger: A griefer used multiple grids, including Lagniappe Grid, to cause trouble.
Diamond / “I Am Watching You” publicly posted about it but named the grid (Lagniappe) instead of the individual griefer.
Impact: This was interpreted as accusing Ms Kal (Lagniappe’s founder) of negligence or complicity.
That’s where the accusations of slander arise. Lagniappe was also a victim of griefing, yet the post left the impression they were at fault.
2. Positions of the Parties
Ms Kal:
Asserts she acted with integrity by banning the griefer immediately and reporting him.
Demands a public apology and correction because her name and grid were smeared.
Frames the issue around integrity and healing (since she has personal trauma connected to the subject matter).
Diamond / I Am Watching You:
Argues she was “just stating facts”—that the griefer came from Lagniappe.
Admits she didn’t contact Kal first and apologizes for that, but not for the public post.
Shifts blame back, saying Kal should apologize for allowing the griefer on her grid.
Alternates between defensiveness, hostility, and minimizing (“get a life,” “done with this”).
Star Ravenhurst (you):
Steps in as defender of Kal (your sister).
Pushes the moral framing: integrity, accountability, and compassion.
Calls out Diamond’s refusal to apologize as the root problem.
Adds context about Kal’s PTSD and how her grid is part of her healing.
Others (Harleyjannys, Speck, Dorena, etc.):
Harleyjannys: Both sides slipped, the healthy way forward is mutual apologies.
Speck: Points out similarities in writing style, questions authenticity.
Dorena: Dismissive of Diamond’s behavior, supports Kal.
Dunkan: Derails with misogynistic, trolling comments.
3. Rhetorical and Behavioral Patterns
Diamond: defensive, aggressive, self-justifying, unwilling to concede fault beyond a limited apology for not messaging privately.
Kal: principled, firm, deeply personal, invokes trauma and integrity. Uses structured arguments with evidence (logs, statements).
Star: compassionate but stern; moral authority stance; points out inconsistencies and appeals to accountability.
Observers: mixed—some neutral mediation attempts, others inflaming or dismissing.
4. Escalation Dynamics
The dispute moved from a single mistaken post → to accusations of slander → to personal character attacks.
Both Kal and Diamond doubled down instead of de-escalating.
Repetition of demands (“Apologize!” vs. “No Slander!!”) entrenched the fight.
Emotional trauma and personal history made it more than “just drama” for Kal and Star.
5. Key Insights
The heart of it: The original mistake (naming Lagniappe) could have been defused with a quick correction and apology. Diamond’s refusal to apologize escalated it into a prolonged conflict.
Power struggle: Now it’s about pride, integrity, and saving face—not the original griefer.
Community perspective: Outsiders (like Harleyjannys) see the griefer as the real problem, and the feud as handing the griefer a victory.
Reputation stakes: For Kal, her grid is her identity and sanctuary. For Diamond, apologizing feels like losing power.
Resolution pathway: Only possible through mutual acknowledgment of harm—without it, the fight cycles endlessly.
✅ Summary:
This is a reputational conflict inflamed by miscommunication, pride, and personal wounds. Lagniappe was wrongfully implicated, Diamond won’t apologize, Kal insists on integrity and correction, and Star defends Kal passionately. The community is weary of the drama and sees apology and moving on as the only healthy path. Without that, the feud will keep feeding the griefer’s success.
like(0)
1. The Core Conflict
Trigger: A griefer used multiple grids, including Lagniappe Grid, to cause trouble.
Diamond / “I Am Watching You” publicly posted about it but named the grid (Lagniappe) instead of the individual griefer.
Impact: This was interpreted as accusing Ms Kal (Lagniappe’s founder) of negligence or complicity.
That’s where the accusations of slander arise. Lagniappe was also a victim of griefing, yet the post left the impression they were at fault.
2. Positions of the Parties
Ms Kal:
Asserts she acted with integrity by banning the griefer immediately and reporting him.
Demands a public apology and correction because her name and grid were smeared.
Frames the issue around integrity and healing (since she has personal trauma connected to the subject matter).
Diamond / I Am Watching You:
Argues she was “just stating facts”—that the griefer came from Lagniappe.
Admits she didn’t contact Kal first and apologizes for that, but not for the public post.
Shifts blame back, saying Kal should apologize for allowing the griefer on her grid.
Alternates between defensiveness, hostility, and minimizing (“get a life,” “done with this”).
Star Ravenhurst (you):
Steps in as defender of Kal (your sister).
Pushes the moral framing: integrity, accountability, and compassion.
Calls out Diamond’s refusal to apologize as the root problem.
Adds context about Kal’s PTSD and how her grid is part of her healing.
Others (Harleyjannys, Speck, Dorena, etc.):
Harleyjannys: Both sides slipped, the healthy way forward is mutual apologies.
Speck: Points out similarities in writing style, questions authenticity.
Dorena: Dismissive of Diamond’s behavior, supports Kal.
Dunkan: Derails with misogynistic, trolling comments.
3. Rhetorical and Behavioral Patterns
Diamond: defensive, aggressive, self-justifying, unwilling to concede fault beyond a limited apology for not messaging privately.
Kal: principled, firm, deeply personal, invokes trauma and integrity. Uses structured arguments with evidence (logs, statements).
Star: compassionate but stern; moral authority stance; points out inconsistencies and appeals to accountability.
Observers: mixed—some neutral mediation attempts, others inflaming or dismissing.
4. Escalation Dynamics
The dispute moved from a single mistaken post → to accusations of slander → to personal character attacks.
Both Kal and Diamond doubled down instead of de-escalating.
Repetition of demands (“Apologize!” vs. “No Slander!!”) entrenched the fight.
Emotional trauma and personal history made it more than “just drama” for Kal and Star.
5. Key Insights
The heart of it: The original mistake (naming Lagniappe) could have been defused with a quick correction and apology. Diamond’s refusal to apologize escalated it into a prolonged conflict.
Power struggle: Now it’s about pride, integrity, and saving face—not the original griefer.
Community perspective: Outsiders (like Harleyjannys) see the griefer as the real problem, and the feud as handing the griefer a victory.
Reputation stakes: For Kal, her grid is her identity and sanctuary. For Diamond, apologizing feels like losing power.
Resolution pathway: Only possible through mutual acknowledgment of harm—without it, the fight cycles endlessly.
✅ Summary:
This is a reputational conflict inflamed by miscommunication, pride, and personal wounds. Lagniappe was wrongfully implicated, Diamond won’t apologize, Kal insists on integrity and correction, and Star defends Kal passionately. The community is weary of the drama and sees apology and moving on as the only healthy path. Without that, the feud will keep feeding the griefer’s success.