|
GlennXpletive @GlennXpletive
Republic of the United States
Offline
Still Chat Banned by "Inclusive Weak minded Libtards that allow a fucking idiot like Suzie Avoside who cannot even write in English, to profess her fucking retarded love for old fat dirtbag idiot Karl Marx. Fuck You.NOT A Builder ANYMORE of many products both in-world and the internet. Left Secondlife after 14 years. Now DONE Helping you weak minded Libtards.. |
Threads
View context
The link didn't work, url here: https://pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Difference-B...
like(0)
View context
As much as I am a person who doesn't follow Allen or Philosophy much, that is a very true statement.
I merely conveyed my opinion that I "personally" don't like Freeman and put zero value upon his opinions. As for Einstein's statement you made, the internet didn't exist until about 20 years after he died.
I agree with your opinion of Allen, because you're right, he was never an actor (I think) lol
So I didn't intend to get into a philosophical debate nor derail this topic into Freeman, merely pointed out the facts of why I discount anything someone types onto a Jpeg image and spreads it around, glorifying Freeman who was just a HS graduate and E3 in the Air Force.
For the benefit of the site, at least it stayed civil and constructive. Instead of the usual As The Grid Turns drama by green goblins living under a bridge charging travelers a toll.
like(0)
I merely conveyed my opinion that I "personally" don't like Freeman and put zero value upon his opinions. As for Einstein's statement you made, the internet didn't exist until about 20 years after he died.
I agree with your opinion of Allen, because you're right, he was never an actor (I think) lol
So I didn't intend to get into a philosophical debate nor derail this topic into Freeman, merely pointed out the facts of why I discount anything someone types onto a Jpeg image and spreads it around, glorifying Freeman who was just a HS graduate and E3 in the Air Force.
For the benefit of the site, at least it stayed civil and constructive. Instead of the usual As The Grid Turns drama by green goblins living under a bridge charging travelers a toll.
One last thing. You mentioned Morgan Freeman's United States Air Force rank a couple of times. (He turned down a college scholarship to enlist). Fortunately, he wasn't wounded, captured or killed in service. I understand, on good authority, that would have made him a real sucker and loser!
like(1)
Einstein? Internet? It's a joke. A joke! It illustrates the point I was making. Now, unfortunately, back to the topic, "Famous People and the Things They Never Said."
The reason for attributing a quote to a famous person is not to glorify the person. It's an attempt to persuade someone by use of what I call "borrowed authority."
If I post a picture of myself with the text, "God helps those who help themselves," would anyone even notice it, much less be persuaded by the idea? But use a picture of Jesus instead, and it will be noticed, and likely believed.
Except, Jesus never said that. It was said in 1698 by Algernon Sidney, an English politician, and published by Benjamin Franklin in Poor Richard’s Almanac. I'm not sure either of them were any kind of experts when it came to god. But people who want to promote the idea can borrow the authority granted Jesus by believers to support the statement. (In fact, some consider the expression contrary to the message of the bible).
Borrowed authority. It's a wonderful thing if you want to win an argument by pretending someone well-known said what you want to be believed.
like(1)
The reason for attributing a quote to a famous person is not to glorify the person. It's an attempt to persuade someone by use of what I call "borrowed authority."
If I post a picture of myself with the text, "God helps those who help themselves," would anyone even notice it, much less be persuaded by the idea? But use a picture of Jesus instead, and it will be noticed, and likely believed.
Except, Jesus never said that. It was said in 1698 by Algernon Sidney, an English politician, and published by Benjamin Franklin in Poor Richard’s Almanac. I'm not sure either of them were any kind of experts when it came to god. But people who want to promote the idea can borrow the authority granted Jesus by believers to support the statement. (In fact, some consider the expression contrary to the message of the bible).
Borrowed authority. It's a wonderful thing if you want to win an argument by pretending someone well-known said what you want to be believed.
Yes I got the joke part, didn't need it explained. But I appreciate your explanation of borrowed authority, however my only critique of it is can be misinterpreted as plagiarized.
I'm going to just leave it at that, because this really is turning into a long drawn out philosophical debate and needless discussion that completely de-railed the original topic unfairly.
Thanks for the input.
liked(1)
I'm going to just leave it at that, because this really is turning into a long drawn out philosophical debate and needless discussion that completely de-railed the original topic unfairly.
Thanks for the input.
View context
Depends how you define scientific in the context of emotional regulation. Are you measuring or observing? Also need to define what weak, strong and intelligent means. Is he saying that intelligent people have more control over their emotions or is it intelligent to control them? Can someone with a lower IQ than Einstein have control over their emotions making them intelligent? So many questions so little time, would take decades long research and funding to come up with the solutions to it. :)
like(0)
This saying is based on empirical evidence about the importance of cultivating emotional strength and intelligence. These principles helped Einstein focus on groundbreaking scientific work despite personal challenges.
liked(1)
His forte was mathematics. He is a human making an observed opinion or personal choice.
I can easily disagree with his observed opinion in such that I am strong and intelligent and prefer to address, confront or handle with a choice to ignore.
like(0)
I can easily disagree with his observed opinion in such that I am strong and intelligent and prefer to address, confront or handle with a choice to ignore.
View context
It's shit and paper down a pipe on port 80. I still sleep with one foot out from under the covers at night with the fan on and neckie no matter what they say. What upsets the turds is they live inside a bubble of fake plastic bullshit a fantasy world of crap and paper, when you pop the fart bubble they get upset and comment because they live shitty lives outside of it.
liked(1)
View context
Can all be summed up in ONE word: Patience.
Personally, I can't stand Morgan Freeman. What he said is true, but spent so many words just to convey a single word, as is typical of him. The guy is literally a HS graduate and only made E-3 in the military, but has convinced the world, that he is some kind of philosophy professor. It's like listening to the wisdom of a convenience store clerk. Because he played some roles, people think his knowledge is divine.
like(1)
Personally, I can't stand Morgan Freeman. What he said is true, but spent so many words just to convey a single word, as is typical of him. The guy is literally a HS graduate and only made E-3 in the military, but has convinced the world, that he is some kind of philosophy professor. It's like listening to the wisdom of a convenience store clerk. Because he played some roles, people think his knowledge is divine.
Tolerance could apply, but it requires a massive amount of PATIENCE to invoke tolerance having to deal with the intolerant emotionally disturbed.
liked(2)
"Through "tolerance" we develop patience". "Don't allow your emotions to overpower your intelligence."
liked(1)
Patience is a virtue. Tolerance is a performed action. Enough actions will develop into a natural virtue. So don't allow your emotions to overtake your virtue that will affect your intelligence.
liked(1)
Patience is an ability or willingness to suppress restlessness or annoyance when confronted with delay: to have patience with a slow learner. Which is also a performed action. Virtue is thinking and doing what is right and avoiding what is wrong. lol
like(0)
I can see that being some truth. So essentially what you say is both Patience and Tolerance are learned abilities. When you learn to ride a bike, you learn to balance which becomes a natural ability that you do not have to think about. When you pedal and steer the bike down a long road, you consciously turn left and right, but unconsciously balance. Which do you define patience and tolerance? As steering or balance?
like(0)
No, I didn't misread it. Because it doesn't apply. My intelligence is unaffected by my opinion and fact.
liked(1)
View context
lol yes this is truth, with the exception of Copper, who lacks reading comprehension and performs cowardly double hit and runs. Being emotionally disturbed, tends to induce cowardice on a massive scale.
Added, I think your typo suits their posts and actions perfectly!
like(1)
Added, I think your typo suits their posts and actions perfectly!
View context
You should have checked the profile and history. This is not and has never been my FIRST post. But go right on feeling self-righteous and a poster child for exactly what I stated. Intelligence and due dilligence is an asset, consider this a lesson.
like(1)
View context
I respectfully disagree. That USED to be the best rule. But in my case, I indulge in mental beat downs of the deserving, that have subjected me as well as others so much to change the rule, that I REALLY enjoy forcing them to grab crates of tissues for their issues, pampers, puppies and pacifiers and cower away in their safe space (aka mom's basement). lol
like(0)
I somewhat agree with this statement. A lot of times it is best to just ignore the tolls and get on with life. Other times I agree with you that a verbal dagger to the soul is in order. What is bad though is when I see people respond to the same 8 people complaining about "the issue" by unplugging their beacons or "respond by withdrawing" and essentially shoot themselves in the foot.
liked(1)
I can agree to that as well. It depends upon the situation and the person. Some deserve am onslaught that causes them to run for blue dots for reinforcement, some deserve to be told off and to shut up and move on. Then there's the "copper" type, make false claims and accusations and then run away like a coward.
My absolute faves are the constipated cowards that commit cancel culture with zero communication or justification. They are 100% sheep and social animals that are so anally retentive, they suck up the chair when they sit, demanding you agree with them or die.
I love a healthy debate, intelligent argument or disagreement, it's what makes the world better. More is accomplished by seeing both sides. Though in this day and age, one side is 100% unstable, deranged, spoiled, violent and unable to perform critical thinking. But by disagreeing with them, you are called mentally unstable and lots of other uneducated terms.
So I present logic and indulge in the meltdowns ;-P
like(0)
My absolute faves are the constipated cowards that commit cancel culture with zero communication or justification. They are 100% sheep and social animals that are so anally retentive, they suck up the chair when they sit, demanding you agree with them or die.
I love a healthy debate, intelligent argument or disagreement, it's what makes the world better. More is accomplished by seeing both sides. Though in this day and age, one side is 100% unstable, deranged, spoiled, violent and unable to perform critical thinking. But by disagreeing with them, you are called mentally unstable and lots of other uneducated terms.
So I present logic and indulge in the meltdowns ;-P
View context
Oh wah fucking wah, B.O.O. H.O.O. you wanted cancel culture and live off drama. You got cancel cultured. Deal with it like you tell us to do when we disagree with your Nazi Commie Marxist demands. G.F.Y.V.M. E.S.A.D. too bad so sad. Have a crate of tissues for your issues and cry me the seven seas. I don't care. Not listening la lalalalala fingers in my ears. (Sound familir? Enjoy your own medicine)
like(3)
View context
Well maybe I should add, that anyone in this discussion, should not be anti-capitalist or socialist. If they are, and are bitching and moaning about NOT making money off of creations they spent time and worked on, is a piece of garbage with zero stake in this topic because they support and actively pursue free everything, spread the wealth and other Marxist Communist garbage.
like(1)
View context
Jupiter, SL also OWNS anything and everything uploaded. If you read their terms, this has been being applied since about 2010. It was another reason I held back creating new things. Even your pictures you share with friends, they claim ownership. Fartbook does this as well. You foresake any and all rights, once something is uploaded to SL or Fartbook.
like(0)
View context
OK I've been away alot lately for both RL and work reasons, so I am late replying to this. There is an answer to this, but it's complicated.
First off, SL was originally created back in 98 to test a theory of whether a digital economy could work. What it evolved into and OpenSim began from was simply, bringing creations in for a social purpose. This is the reason no grid will ever get off the ground because they worked backwards.
Yes SL and Opensim are Glorified Chatrooms. You read that correctly. So we went from AOL chatrooms of A/S/L? To a 3rd version and each wanted to up the other with being more fancy pants or cooler. So instead of a flat avatar face next to text, you could now play dress up and stand around one of the bazillion clubs and your avatar could dance while you chatted and gesturbated.
SL evolved into, offering you a more private space to have that chatroom convo and have sexy time, a free sandbox to create something in which 90% of creations were for avatar enhancements (Fashion, Skin, Hair) or actions (Car, House, Plane). 10% was my cornered market until banned (Fun stuff like farters).
Opensim picked up from this point on, where it wasn't about the economy, it was about freedom and independence of the Gestapo Lindens. Now you can be the god, and yes along with it came the god complexes (Originally dictator sim owners, to full fledged whole grid Stalins).
What is missing here? No focus on the economy. Only the social and drama aspect. It is no longer the primary purpose. Creators will build mostly based on demands and needs. As a builder, scripter, animation creator, texture creator, terraformer, etc. yes I can build ALOT, but no longer will I ever do it for SL. I was glad to cash out my Lindens before the 3 new technology impotent owners bought it, because they kept what little I left in it upon being banned for no reason. No biggie, but they lose.
In Opensim, everything that can be god modded, will be copied and the creator almost never compensated in any way shape or form.
Creations can take anywhere from hours to weeks. Based on FJBShittypants we should all be paid like 20 bucks an hour. Anyone here making that much for their creations? No. But I know alot create for fun. Mostly now that is what I do. I don't expect jack shit from payment.
Kitely has a decent plan and idea. However, another aspect that was mentioned here is the Globit versus PayPal. Well as most of you never read real news, the answer to that question is, if you earn more than $600 per year through PayPal, you will be audited by one of the 87,000 IRS just hired. That is the fact Jack, so a measly 600 bucks, will get you an audit. (I have my own software dev company and I have to follow tax laws and assinine shit like this for my main business.) Globeit, is the unregulated wild west. What happened before with cyber currency when the owners shut it down for months with no reason or answer, leaving thousands unable to cash out, can happen with Globeit. You are damned if you do, and damned it you don't.
Hopefully these 87k IRS agents that have been armed with Glocks and body armor to accompany their pocket protectors and birth control glasses, will be fired in November. I can't say the same for the Euro crowd, but England is the worst and Germany is desperately broke and cracking down looking for money. (Example? Harrassing Schwarzenegger over his watch he put up for a charity auction, for not paying duty, when he flew through Munich). So hopefully, if the IRS agents in the US are shitcanned, the Euros usually follow suit.
As for the DMCA, well it's being abused like crazy. Originally intended and created to protect record labels from stolen pirated music. They arrested a dingbat kid for downloading copyrighted songs. Hell some of these asshole artists should be happy someone listens to their 40 and 50 year old shit. I found this out the hard way when I tried to play for someone the theme from Who's the Man and the song was done first by Ed Lover and Doctor Dree. Not House of Pain. I had to go through hoops, and I got it played it and now a whole generation of Zoomers know the original song. Prior to my getting it it had ZERO downloads. So that fat fuck should thank me for advertising his shitty old work. Kate Bush is suddenly getting money and famous again because a TV show played one of her shitty songs from the mid 80s. She was lucky, they paid for the copyright but there is thousands of forgotten artists and movies because of this DMCA bullshit that is abused by everyone and anyone who files a claim. Every hater, punk wiseass and drama queen DMCA each other out of spite a massive amount of the time.
As for the future of making money with Opensim, good luck. Yes you can host a grid, rent land. You can get tips, you might get someone to buy a dress on Kitely MP. Will it pay your mortgage? Nope.
SL originally was one mans idea about an economy, that built into a team that made it happen and expanded then fell off the cliff of focus. I have been working for a few months personally on something that will generate revenue, but I reserve any revelation because I am one person with limited time. The answer is there for anyone who has studied basic business and economics. People need an incentive to build, and people need an incentive to pay. And that's my horseshit and sauerkraut opinion on this.
like(2)
First off, SL was originally created back in 98 to test a theory of whether a digital economy could work. What it evolved into and OpenSim began from was simply, bringing creations in for a social purpose. This is the reason no grid will ever get off the ground because they worked backwards.
Yes SL and Opensim are Glorified Chatrooms. You read that correctly. So we went from AOL chatrooms of A/S/L? To a 3rd version and each wanted to up the other with being more fancy pants or cooler. So instead of a flat avatar face next to text, you could now play dress up and stand around one of the bazillion clubs and your avatar could dance while you chatted and gesturbated.
SL evolved into, offering you a more private space to have that chatroom convo and have sexy time, a free sandbox to create something in which 90% of creations were for avatar enhancements (Fashion, Skin, Hair) or actions (Car, House, Plane). 10% was my cornered market until banned (Fun stuff like farters).
Opensim picked up from this point on, where it wasn't about the economy, it was about freedom and independence of the Gestapo Lindens. Now you can be the god, and yes along with it came the god complexes (Originally dictator sim owners, to full fledged whole grid Stalins).
What is missing here? No focus on the economy. Only the social and drama aspect. It is no longer the primary purpose. Creators will build mostly based on demands and needs. As a builder, scripter, animation creator, texture creator, terraformer, etc. yes I can build ALOT, but no longer will I ever do it for SL. I was glad to cash out my Lindens before the 3 new technology impotent owners bought it, because they kept what little I left in it upon being banned for no reason. No biggie, but they lose.
In Opensim, everything that can be god modded, will be copied and the creator almost never compensated in any way shape or form.
Creations can take anywhere from hours to weeks. Based on FJBShittypants we should all be paid like 20 bucks an hour. Anyone here making that much for their creations? No. But I know alot create for fun. Mostly now that is what I do. I don't expect jack shit from payment.
Kitely has a decent plan and idea. However, another aspect that was mentioned here is the Globit versus PayPal. Well as most of you never read real news, the answer to that question is, if you earn more than $600 per year through PayPal, you will be audited by one of the 87,000 IRS just hired. That is the fact Jack, so a measly 600 bucks, will get you an audit. (I have my own software dev company and I have to follow tax laws and assinine shit like this for my main business.) Globeit, is the unregulated wild west. What happened before with cyber currency when the owners shut it down for months with no reason or answer, leaving thousands unable to cash out, can happen with Globeit. You are damned if you do, and damned it you don't.
Hopefully these 87k IRS agents that have been armed with Glocks and body armor to accompany their pocket protectors and birth control glasses, will be fired in November. I can't say the same for the Euro crowd, but England is the worst and Germany is desperately broke and cracking down looking for money. (Example? Harrassing Schwarzenegger over his watch he put up for a charity auction, for not paying duty, when he flew through Munich). So hopefully, if the IRS agents in the US are shitcanned, the Euros usually follow suit.
As for the DMCA, well it's being abused like crazy. Originally intended and created to protect record labels from stolen pirated music. They arrested a dingbat kid for downloading copyrighted songs. Hell some of these asshole artists should be happy someone listens to their 40 and 50 year old shit. I found this out the hard way when I tried to play for someone the theme from Who's the Man and the song was done first by Ed Lover and Doctor Dree. Not House of Pain. I had to go through hoops, and I got it played it and now a whole generation of Zoomers know the original song. Prior to my getting it it had ZERO downloads. So that fat fuck should thank me for advertising his shitty old work. Kate Bush is suddenly getting money and famous again because a TV show played one of her shitty songs from the mid 80s. She was lucky, they paid for the copyright but there is thousands of forgotten artists and movies because of this DMCA bullshit that is abused by everyone and anyone who files a claim. Every hater, punk wiseass and drama queen DMCA each other out of spite a massive amount of the time.
As for the future of making money with Opensim, good luck. Yes you can host a grid, rent land. You can get tips, you might get someone to buy a dress on Kitely MP. Will it pay your mortgage? Nope.
SL originally was one mans idea about an economy, that built into a team that made it happen and expanded then fell off the cliff of focus. I have been working for a few months personally on something that will generate revenue, but I reserve any revelation because I am one person with limited time. The answer is there for anyone who has studied basic business and economics. People need an incentive to build, and people need an incentive to pay. And that's my horseshit and sauerkraut opinion on this.
View context
I am available if any barefoot dreamers residents have any questions or need assistance. I can best be reached by sending my avatar a notecard on barefoot and I will reply asap.
like(2)
